Motion To Intervene and To Suspend the Memorandum Opinion and Order of July, 3, 2012
July 24, 2012
By Richard R. Cheatham
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 24 Richard R. Cheatham moves to intervene in this action in order to
protect his interest in the subject of the action and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 to suspend
the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order of July, 3, 2012 pending reconsideration in light of the
facts presented in connection Intervener's Motion to Intervene.
In support of this motion, Richard R. Cheatham relies on the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order
of July, 3, 2012 and his Memorandum In Support of Motion To Intervene and To Suspend Memorandum
Opinion and Order of July, 3, 2012.
Motion To Intervene and To Suspend the Memorandum Opinion and Order.
SENATE and HOUSE letter to Schapiro
July 2012 Senate Letter to Schapiro.
July 2012 House Letter to Schapiro.
SIPC OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO INTERVENE
On July 24, 2012, Richard Cheatham filed a motion to intervene and to "suspend" the Court's July 3 Opinion—three weeks after the fact. Although he provides no documentary evidence in support of his assertions, Cheatham contends that brokers from the Stanford Group Company ("SGC") purchased Stanford International Bank, Ltd. ("SIBL") CDs for him without his knowledge, and that the SEC failed to consider the "atypical" nature of these CD purchases in pursuing its case. The Court should reject Cheatham's thirteenth-hour motion for three separate and independent reasons...
Read the complete SIPC OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO INTERVENE.
READER DISCUSSION
SIVG reserves the right to delete comments that are off-topic or offensive. Excessively long comments may be moderated as well. SIVG cannot facilitate requests to remove comments or explain individual moderation decisions. The comments posted here, express only the views of their authors and not the administrators/moderators from SIVG; for that reason SIVG won't be held responsible for those contents
Showing 0 comments...