La. Stanford victims' negligence claims moving forward
March 20, 2012
By Leslie Turk
On Monday the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans reversed a 2011 lower-court ruling, clearing the way
for state court class actions against financial advisers, lawyers and other third parties accused of aiding convicted
financial Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme.
U.S. District Judge David Godbey in Dallas had ruled in 2011 that the federal Securities Litigation Uniform Standards
Act, or SLUSA, barred the state cases in Louisiana and Texas because they were related to securities fraud.
But the federal three-judge appeals court panel said that law was only "tangentially related" to the fraud alleged by
the plaintiffs, the sale of bogus CDs issued by Stanford's Antigua-based Stanford International Bank Ltd.
Defendants include Stanford financial advisers, SEI Investments Co, which was accused of inducing investors to move
retirement funds into the CDs, and the insurance brokerage Willis Group Holdings.
Phillip Preis, a lawyer for plaintiffs who has estimated total losses of $1 billion among some 1,000 Louisiana investors,
said the ruling was the most significant for investors since Stanford's fraud was uncovered in February 2009.
"It will allow us to assert negligence claims," Preis told the Chicago Tribune. "It's a
big deal." The plaintiffs in the Preis lawsuits affected by the appeals court's decision claim that SEI Investments Co.
and Stanford's financial advisers, among them Tiffany Angelle and Hank Mills, both of whom worked out of the former
Lafayette office in River Ranch, either knew or should have known that Stanford was stealing their money.
Preis also told Baton Rouge's Daily Report that the ruling is significant because state law
only requires that plaintiffs prove negligence, not outright fraud, on the part of those entities. Preis said the
appeals court's decision makes it more likely that those people will be made whole:
Preis filed the original class action suit in Baton Rouge's 19th Judicial District against the Stanford Trust, trust
administrator SEI, a major international firm, and the Louisiana Office of Financial Institutions. Defendants were able
to move the suit to federal court, but the Fifth Circuit (Monday) remanded the suit back to Baton Rouge. Preis expects
to meet with Judge R. Michael Caldwell during the next six weeks to set a new schedule for the suit. "All those big
companies like SEI that supported Stanford," Preis says, "we have a very viable claim against them."
A Houston federal jury found Stanford guilty March 6 on 13 criminal counts, including fraud, conspiracy and obstructing
the SEC's investigation. The 61-year-old could face more than 200 years in prison at his June 14 sentencing, or a
maximum of about 20 years if he is sentenced to concurrent terms, the Tribune reported.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
READER DISCUSSION
SIVG reserves the right to delete comments that are off-topic or offensive. Excessively long comments may be moderated as well. SIVG cannot facilitate requests to remove comments or explain individual moderation decisions. The comments posted here, express only the views of their authors and not the administrators/moderators from SIVG; for that reason SIVG won't be held responsible for those contents
Showing 0 comments...