SEC Order Against Stanford
April 25, 2013
By U.S. District Judge David C. Godbey
Securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff, vs. Stanford International Bank LTD., et al. Defendants. Civil
Action No. 3:09-CV-0298-N
This Order addresses Plaintiff Security and Exchange Commission's ("SEC") motion for partial summary judgment
[1779]. The Court grants the motion. The Court also denies Defendant R. Allen Stanford's motion for extension
of time [1807].
The Court grants the SEC's motion for summary judgment. The Court enjoins Stanford from violating the Exchange
Act § 10(b), Rule 10b-5, the Securities Act § 17(a), and the Advisers Act § 206(1) and (2), enjoins Davis
violating the Exchange Act § 10(b), Rule 10b-5, the Securities Act § 17(a), and enjoins SGC and SIB from
violating the Exchange Act § 10(b), Rule 10b-5, the Securities Act § 17(a), the Advisers Act § 206(1) and (2),
and the Investment Company Act § 7(d). The Court finds Stanford, Davis, SGC, and SIB jointly and severally
liable to disgorge the $5.9 billion fraudulently acquired by Stanford's scheme. The Court adds $861,189,969.06
of prejudgment interest to this total, for a total disgorgement liability of $6,761,189,969.06. Finally, the
Court imposes a civil penalty of $5.9 billion on Stanford and $5 million on Davis.
Read the complete Order of U.S. District Judge David C. Godbey.
READER DISCUSSION
SIVG reserves the right to delete comments that are off-topic or offensive. Excessively long comments may be moderated as well. SIVG cannot facilitate requests to remove comments or explain individual moderation decisions. The comments posted here, express only the views of their authors and not the administrators/moderators from SIVG; for that reason SIVG won't be held responsible for those contents
Showing 0 comments...