US-Committee in opposition to Grant Thornton
December 5, 2011
By the US-Committee
The Official Stanford Investors Committee (the "Investors Committee") submits this brief in opposition to
the Petition for Recognition of Foreign Main Proceeding Pursuant to Chapter 15 of Bankruptcy Code (the
"Petition"). The Petition was originally filed by former liquidators, Nigel Hamilton-Smith and Peter
Wastell, and is now championed by Marcus Wide and Hugh Dickson (the "Joint Liquidators").
The Investors Committee respectfully urges the Court to deny the Joint Liquidators any form of recognition
under Chapter 15. Any recognition of these Joint Liquidators would be "manifestly contrary to the public
policy of the United States". That is so for at least four separate reasons.
First, the appointment of the Joint Liquidators (and their predecessors) was pursued and obtained in
violation of this Court's Orders. Granting these Joint Liquidators any form of Chapter 15 recognition,
under these circumstances, would undermine fundamental regulatory and jurisdictional policies of the United
States.
Second, there are significant conflicts of interest raised by the Joint Liquidators's request for
recognition as the "foreign main" proceeding. The Receivership Estate has significant claims against the
Antiguan government that will likely be frustrated (or abandoned) if the Joint Liquidators achieve
"foreign main" recognition. The Investors Committee believes those conflicts are exacerbated by the
multiple representations that have been undertaken in this proceeding by counsel for the Joint
Liquidators.
Third, the recognition sought by the Joint Liquidators should be denied because it is very much a
"one-way street." The Antiguan courts have already refused to recognize this Court's Receiver, finding
both that the Receiver has "no legal entitlement to standing in Antigua and Barbuda" and that this
Court's Order appointing the Receiver and taking sole possession of the assets of the various Stanford
entities, including SIBL, was "unenforceable."
Fourth, recognition should be denied because it has become painfully obvious that the Antiguan
government and the Antiguan judicial system have no real interest in prosecuting the individuals
responsible for the Stanford fraud, nor in recovering assets for the benefit of Stanford's
investor-victims.
READER DISCUSSION
SIVG reserves the right to delete comments that are off-topic or offensive. Excessively long comments may be moderated as well. SIVG cannot facilitate requests to remove comments or explain individual moderation decisions. The comments posted here, express only the views of their authors and not the administrators/moderators from SIVG; for that reason SIVG won't be held responsible for those contents
Showing 1 comments...
| International Victim wrote on December 6, 2011 at 09:44 |
|
It is incredible the US-Committee wrote that [ Antiguan government and the Antiguan judicial system
have no real interest in prosecuting the individuals responsible for the Stanford fraud... ] And what about the USA government and the American judicial system??? Look what is happening with Allen Stanford who almost died with a beat in prision. Look at all delay and behaviour of the Judge. You the "American" believe to be always the good guy but in this case you are the most corrupted people ever! You must be ashamed because YOU are the responsible of this fraud! The SEC, the DOJ, the Republican, FINRA, Florida's State, YOU ALL are accomplice of this Fraud! |